SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 220

Supreme Court Of India
DECCAN SUGAR AND ABKARI COMPANY LIMITED
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, A. P.
Decided on February 13,2002

The State Legislature has no jurisdiction to levy excise duty on rectified spirit, as it does not fall under the category of potable liquor fit for human consumption.

Headnote:

Excise Duty - Rectified Spirit - The court held that the State Legislature has no jurisdiction to levy any excise duty on rectified spirit, as it does not fall under the category of potable liquor fit for human consumption. The decision in Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U. P. was followed, and the impugned order of the Commissioner of Excise was set aside.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was demanded to pay excise duty for the loss of rectified spirit, but the court found that the State Legislature had no jurisdiction to levy excise duty on rectified spirit.

Finding of the Court:

The court analyzed the order of the Excise Commissioner and the relevant legal precedents, and concluded that the duty sought to be levied on the loss of rectified spirit was not within the jurisdiction of the State Legislature.

Issues: The issue was whether the State had the authority to levy excise duty on rectified spirit, and whether the demand notice issued to the appellant was valid.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the legal principle established in Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U. P., which held that the State Legislature cannot impose excise duty on rectified spirit.

Final Decision: The court set aside the decision of the Excise Commissioner and allowed the appeal, with no order as to costs.

Judgment

( 1 ) IN the instant case, the demand from the appellant as per the order of the Excise Commissioner was as follows:

"hence a demand notice is hereby issued to you to pay excise duty for an amount of Rs 1,59,15,376. 40 for the loss of rectified spirit amounting to 6,18,842 litres (10,33,466 PLs) calculated at the rate of Rs 15. 40 PL. You may note that this does not in any way prevent the commissioner from initiating any action to cancel your licence. "

( 2 ) IT is settled by the decision of this Court in Synthetics and Chemicals ltd. v. State of U. P. that the State Legislature has no jurisdiction to levy any excise duty on rectified spirit. The State can levy excise duty only on potable liquor fit for human consumption and as rectified spirit does not fall under that category the State Legislature cannot impose any excise duty. The decision in Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U. P. has been followed in State of U. P. v. Modi Distillery where certain wastage of ethyl alcohol was sought to be taxed. This Court following the decision in Synthetics and chemicals Ltd. came to the conclusion that this cannot be done.

( 3 ) IN the present case also, the aforequoted passage from the Excise commissioners order indicates that the duty is sought to be levied on the loss of rectified spirit amounting to 6,18,842 litres. We have already observed that no duty can be levied by the State on the rectified spirit and, therefore, the impugned order of the Commissioner of Excise is set aside. This appeal is allowed accordingly.

( 4 ) NO order as to costs. Civil Appeals Nos. 4381 of 1986, 454 of 1987 and 1832 of 1994

( 5 ) FOR the reasons stated in our order in Civil Appeal No. 4355 of 1985, these appeals are also allowed and the decision of the Excise Commissioner is set aside.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top