SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 220

DECCAN SUGAR AND ABKARI COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, A. P. – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) IN the instant case, the demand from the appellant as per the order of the Excise Commissioner was as follows:

"hence a demand notice is hereby issued to you to pay excise duty for an amount of Rs 1,59,15,376. 40 for the loss of rectified spirit amounting to 6,18,842 litres (10,33,466 PLs) calculated at the rate of Rs 15. 40 PL. You may note that this does not in any way prevent the commissioner from initiating any action to cancel your licence. "

( 2 ) IT is settled by the decision of this Court in Synthetics and Chemicals ltd. v. State of U. P. that the State Legislature has no jurisdiction to levy any excise duty on rectified spirit. The State can levy excise duty only on potable liquor fit for human consumption and as rectified spirit does not fall under that category the State Legislature cannot impose any excise duty. The decision in Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U. P. has been followed in State of U. P. v. Modi Distillery where certain wastage of ethyl alcohol was sought to be taxed. This Court following the decision in Synthetics and chemicals Ltd. came to the conclusion that this cannot be done.

( 3 ) IN the present case also, the aforequoted passag


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top