Judgment

S.N. VARIAVA, J.- This writ petition has been filed challenging a 9 scheme framed by Reserve Bank of India (for short RBI). Mr Lalit very fairly stated at the beginning that he is not challenging the Scheme and that the only prayer he is pressing is prayer (g), which reads as follows:

"(g) Issue a writ or order in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to repay the petitioners and other fixed-deposit holders of the erstwhile Sikkim Bank Ltd. in full, including the principal along with h the contract rate of interest (14 p.a.)."

2. At this stage, the facts may be briefly set out:

On 2-8-1985 Sikkim Banking Overseas Corporation Limited got itself registered as a company in Sikkim. On 22-10-1987 its name was changed to Sikkim Banking Limited (for short SBL). On 11-12-1987 the Banking Regulation Act (for short the Act) became applicable to Sikkim. Section 22 of the Act reads as follows:

"22. Licensing of banking companies.-(l) Save as hereinafter provided, no company shall carryon banking business in India unless it holds a licence issued in that behalf by the Reserve Bank and any such licence may be issued subject to such conditions as the Reserve Bank may think fit to impose.

(2) Every banking company in existence on the commencement of this Act, before the expiry of six months from such commencement, and every other company before commencing banking business in India, shall apply in writing to the Reserve Bank for a licence under this section:

Provided that in the case of a banking company in existence on the commencement of this Act, nothing in sub-section (1) shall be deemed to prohibit the company from carrying on banking business until it is granted a licence in pursuance of this section or is by notice in writing informed by the Reserve Bank that a licence cannot be granted to it:

Provided further that the Reserve Bank shall not give a notice as aforesaid to a banking company in existence on the commencement of this Act before the expiry of the three years referred to in sub-section (1) of Section 11 or of such further period as the Reserve Bank may under that sub-section think fit to allow.

(3) Before granting any licence under this section, the Reserve Bank may require to be satisfied by an inspection of the books of the company or otherwise that the following conditions are fulfilled, namely-

(a) that the company is or will be in a position to pay its present or future depositors in full as their claims accrue;

(b) that the affairs of the company are not being, or are not likely to be, conducted in a manner detrimental to the interests of its present or future depositors;

(c) that the general character of the proposed management of the company will not be prejudicial to the public interest or the interest of its depositors;

(d) that the company has adequate capital structure and earning prospects;

(e) that the public interest will be served by the grant of a licence to the company to carryon banking business in India;

if) that having regard to the banking facilities available in the proposed principal area of operations of the company, the potential scope for expansion of banks already in existence in the area and other relevant factors the grant of the licence would not be prejudicial to the operation and consolidation of the banking system consistent with monetary stability and economic growth;

(g) any other condition, the fulfilment of which would, in the opinion of the Reserve Bank, be necessary to ensure that the carrying on of banking business in India by the company will not be prejudicial to the public interest or the interests of the depositors.

(3-A) Before granting any licence under this section to a company incorporated outside India, the Reserve Bank may require to be satisfied by

an inspection of the books of the company or otherwise that the conditions specified in sub-section (3) are fulfilled and that the carrying on of banking business by such company in India will be in the public i