SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 16

RUMA PAL, B.N.AGARWAL
GENERAL MANAGER (D&PB) – Appellant
Versus
KUNTI TIWARY – Respondent


ORDER

1.Leave granted.

2. Respondent 1 is the widow and Respondent 2 is the son of KN.

Tiwary, an erstwhile employee of State Bank of India. KN. Tiwary died while in harness on 16-1-1998. About a month after his death Respondent I applied to the appellant for appointment of Respondent 2 in the appelrants services by way of compassionate appointment. The Branch Manager wrote to Respondent 1 saying that the application had been registered and that a fresh proposal should be made when Respondent 2, who was a minor then, attained majority. Respondent 2 attained majority on 25-2-2000 and the application for compassionate appointment was revived. The Deputy General Manager of the zone where the late KN. Tiwary was working, recommended Respondent 2s case for compassionate appointment and the recommendation contained a footnote in the printed format for appointment on compassionate grounds. The printed format inter alia indicated the details regarding the deceased employee, the terminal benefits, immovable property, investments and liabilities as well as pension paid. The provident fund which was received by Respondent I on the death of the late KN. Tiwary was Rs 3,33,410 (Rupees three lak





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top