SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1271

RUMA PAL, S.B.SINHA, S.H.KAPADIA
M. C. MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

1. It appears that a meeting was held between the Joint Director (Tourism), Regional Officer, U.P. Pollution Control, Agra, the representatives. of CISF, the representatives of the Agra Development Authority, Agra, the representatives of ASI, the police and the District Magistrate, Agra on 19-72004 at which certain proposals like with regard to the illumination of the Tajmonument at night were agreed to. The proposals do not appear to have been cleared by NEERI. This must be obtained before this Court can act on the . basis of the proposals. The proposals should also incorporate the suggestions made by ASI in para 17 and para 3 of the parawise comment of the affidavit filed by ASI. In addition, the proposal should include a direction that Mr Krishan Mahajan, Advocate, should on occasions and according to his convenience, visit the Taj during the night viewing programme in order to see whether the proposals are complied with. Put up after NEERIs clearance and after the x-ray machines have been put in as per CISFs requirements, and computers have been installed by ASI, the cost whereof shall be borne by the State of V.P.

2. ASI as well as CISF are granted liberty to place their

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top