SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 809

WASIM AHMED SAEED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


( 1 ) PURSUANT to our order dated 15-7-2004 the State of U. P. claims that the position is as under:we are also told that pursuant to our abovementioned order, Archaeological survey of India (ASI) and the State of U. P. are in the process of preparing a report which will be submitted to the Court within two weeks from today.

( 2 ) ON behalf of the State of U,p. , it is stated that the State is willing to allot Ghata No. 244/2 to ASI for the purposes of construction of stalls-cum-shops. We are informed that ASI has already transferred a sum of Rs 5 crores to HUDCO and allotted to HUDCO the work of constructing shops on this plot of land.

( 3 ) ON the above statements we direct that the State of U. P. do assign and asi do take possession of the said plot within two weeks from today.

( 4 ) IT is clarified that the ownership of the plot will remain with the State government.

( 5 ) THE work of construction to be completed by HUDCO within one year from today. An officer of HUDCO, an officer of the U. P. State Government and an officer of ASI must be nominated by these bodies to be personally responsible for the construction.

( 6 ) THEY must ensure that the construction is completed withi





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top