PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN vs SUDHA CHOUBEY - 2004 Supreme(SC) 980

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2004 Supreme(SC) 980

Supreme Court Of India
PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN
Versus
SUDHA CHOUBEY
Decided on August 31, 2004

Headnote:
Eviction of Sub-tenant - Disputed premises were given by the Receiver to Vinod Chand Choubey on rent, and it was given to the appellant on sub-tenancy- Tenant was directed to vacate the premises- The High Court rightly held that once the tenant had been directed to be evicted the consequences automatically follow and sub tenant would to vacate the premises [Paras 2 and 3]

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

( 2 ) WE find that from the initial stage Dr. Vinod Chand Choubey having entered into sub-tenancy has been taken note of. In fact from the order of the Rent Controlling Authority, Jabalpur dated 18-8-1999 it is clear that there was no dispute before the said authority that the disputed premises were given by the Receiver to Vinod Chand Choubey on rent, and it was given to the appellant on sub-tenancy.

( 3 ) THE High Court has rightly come to the conclusion that once the tenant has been directed to be evicted the consequences automatically follow so far as the appellant is concerned. We find no infirmity in the order of the High Court.

( 4 ) THE appeals are accordingly dismissed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document