( 1 ) THE matter has been heard at considerable length. The parties have settled. Mr. Jamshed p. Cama, learned senior counsel for the appellant states that the workmen involved in this appeal would be made permanent and may be transferred from Pune in Maharashtra or outside Maharashtra to the Branches of the company, Depots, the Suppliers or dealers of the Company. There would, however, be no change in conditions of service of the workmen involved. The Company would protect the emoluments and service conditions of the workmen subject to the condition that if hours of work and canteen facilities or the like are different in the transferred position/station, the transferred workmen would not decline the transfer on the ground of aforesaid conditions being different. Mr. K. K. Singhvi, learned senior counsel representing the workmen accepts the aforesaid statement made by Mr. I Cama. Further, learned counsel Mr. J. P. Cama i and Mr. Singhvi submit that Respondent No. 39 - Subhash N. Pawar and Respondent No. 49 - kishor R. Patil whose services were terminated and were relieved on June 4, 1997 would be made permanent w. e. f. the date of relieving i. e. June 4, 1997 but they would not b