SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 297

U. P. Resi. Emp. Co-op. House B. Society – Appellant
Versus
New Okhla Indus. Deve. Authority – Respondent


( 1 ) VERY briefly stated facts leading to this application are that for development of Noida, lands belonging to the applicant Society and its members, were acquired. The State Government formulated a policy to allot some developed plot to the members of the Society. As disputes arose during the implementation of that policy, Writ Petition was filed in the Allahabad high Court. Against orders in that Writ Petition a Civil Appeal was filed in this court.

( 2 ) BY an order dated 3rd of May, 1990, certain directions were issued on the basis of a consensus arrived at between the parties. It was agreed and so recorded that allotments be made either in Sectors 40, 41 or 42 and if sufficient number of plots were not available in these sectors then in adjoining sectors. The plots were to be developed by Noida within a period of nine months and the price of the plot was to be at the rate of Rs. 1000/- per sq. meter.

( 3 ) IT appears that 242 members could not be accommodated. Again this court was approached. On 4th April, 1991, statement of counsel for NOIDA was recorded and following order passed:

"as against this suggestion made by the society, counsel for NOIDA states that pursuant to th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top