SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1319

B.N.SRIKRISHNA, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
RAM SAHA – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. – Respondent


Judgment


SHIVARAJ V. PATIL, J.- The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is "whether any permission is required under Section 4- Bread with Section 4-C of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 (for short the Act) by the owners of the orchards to fell the old trees for replacing them by new saplings having greater potential of yield".

2. The appellant is the owner of certain land classified as "bagan" a (garden) in the record-of-rights. Since old trees in the land had been affected with uncontrollable worms and had lost their fruit-bearing ability, the appellant decided to uproot them with an intention to renovate the garden by planting high-breed saplings. After he cut two to three trees, the local police personnel and the Block Land Reforms Officer prevented the appellant from further felling, citing the judgment of the Supreme Court in T.N. Godavarman Thirumulkpad v. Union of India1 The appellant, in these circumstances, approached the High Court by filing Writ Petition No. 16280 of 1997 challenging the action of the officers and seeking certain directions.

A learned Single Judge of the High Court referred the writ petition to the Division Bench (Green Benc
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top