SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 555

GURINDERPAL – Appellant
Versus
JAGMITTAR SINGH – Respondent


( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) THE defendant-respondent entered into a contract to sell a plot of land situated in an urban area in favour of the plaintiff-appellant who filed a suit for specific performance which has been dismissed by the High Court as barred by Or. 2 R. 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The appellant sought for a review of the judgment. The review petition too has been dismissed. These two appeals by special leave are directed against the two judgments respectively dismissing the appeal and the review petition.

( 3 ) IT appears that initially the plaintiff-appellant apprehending that the subject-matter of the contract was likely to be alienated in favour of a third person, filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the suit property in favour of anyone other than the plaintiff-appellant. The suit came up for hearing before the trial court on 15/6/1994 on which date the court made a record of the statement made before it by the plaintiff-appellant as under:

"it is stated that I do not wish to continue with this suit, which may be permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh suit. "

( 4 ) THE abovesaid statement having b





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top