SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 827

Prakash Chand – Appellant
Versus
State Of H. P. – Respondent


Judgment

ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) OVER a petty matter the appellant is supposed to have committed fratricide. He was found guilty by the trial court for offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian penal Code, 1860 (in short the ipc) and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. In appeal, conviction and sentence were upheld by the High Court of Himachal pradesh, Shimla.

( 3 ) ACCUSATIONS which led to the trial of the accused are essentially as follows:

3. 1. Shri Sukh Dev alias Guddu (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) was real younger brother of the accused. On 6. 2. 2000 at about 9. 00 p. m. there was a quarrel between the deceased and the accused. Cause of the quarrel was that the dogs of the accused had entered the kitchen room of the deceased and when the deceased had asked the accused to keep his dogs tied in the chains, verbal altercation took place and tempers flew, the accused went to his room, took out his gun and fired a gun shot at the deceased from a distance of about 35 feet, as a result of which pellets of the gun shot had pierced into the chest of the deceased. Information was lodged with the police, investigation was undertaken and






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top