SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 750

NAYAK RAMESH CHANDRA KESHAVLAL – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


( 1 ) HEARD the learned counsel for the parties.

( 2 ) THE points raised by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant are concluded by a recent judgment of this Court in the case of Basheer v. State of Kerala in relation to the applicability of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 2001, wherein lesser punishment was provided when the quantity seized is a small one, as enumerated in notification bearing SO No. 1055 (E) dated 19/10/2001, published in the Gazette of India (Extra.), Part II, S. 3 (ii) dated 19/10/2001. Proviso to S. 41 of the amending Act referred to above, lays down that the provisions of the amending Act shall not apply to cases pending in appeal, validity of which was challenged before this Court on the ground that the same, being discriminatory, was violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution. But this Court in the case of Basheer upheld the validity of the said provision and, consequently, the provisions of the Amendment Act shall have no application in the present case, as on the date of coming into force of the amending Act, the case of the appellant was pending in appeal before the High Court. No other point having been raised

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top