SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 389

VOLTAS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) THESE appeals are against the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dated 8/6/2001.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts are as follows: in Andhra Pradesh, there was a company known as "hyderabad Allwyn Ltd. " In this Company, the Government of Andhra Pradesh was a major shareholder. The Company suffered huge losses and became a sick company. Therefore, the matter was taken up before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR ).

( 3 ) WHILE the matter was before BIFR, negotiations took place with the appellants for the purpose of reviving at least the Refrigeration Department of that Company. A memorandum of understanding was entered into on 28/3/1993, which, inter alia, provided as under:

"hal has been incurring losses for the past few years and the Government of Andhra Pradesh has decided to disinvest its holding and inter alia privatise HAL with a view to making it a viable unit and achieving the following objectives: (a) To secure the public interest by reviving HAL, balancing the drain on the States exchequer and consequential denial of use of the States finances for other State and public purposes and objectives and obviating allocations of the State budg

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top