SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 320

R. N. GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
ASHWANI KUMAR GUPTA – Respondent


( 1 ) IN the Directorate of Industries in the State of Haryana, there is a service known as "group A" Service (hereinafter referred to as "the Service") and the members of the Service are governed by the Rules, known as "the Haryana Industries (Group A) Service Rules, 1986" (for short "the Rules" ). At relevant point of time, the appellant in CA No. 5644 was holding the post of Deputy Director (Engineering Goods ). Subsequently, he was promoted to the post of Technical Expert (Mechanical Engineering ). The respondents herein challenged the appointment of the appellant by means of a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India. The High Court found that the said appellant did not possess the requisite qualification for being appointed as the Technical Expert (Mechanical Engineering ). Consequently, his appointment was set aside and it is in this way the appellant and the State of Haryana are before us.

( 2 ) IT is not disputed that at the relevant time the appellant was working as the Deputy Director (Engineering Goods ). It is also not disputed that for appointment other than by direct recruitment, the requisite qualifications for appointment to the post of Technical Expert





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top