ASHOK BHAN, A.K.MATHUR
KAUSHALYA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
PREM CHAND – Respondent
ORDER
1. Harnam Singh, father-in-law of the present appellant, was inducted as a tenant by Ajay Kumar Gupta (Respondent 2 herein) in respect of Shops Nos. 3371-72, Chowk Singhara, Qutab Road, Delhi 110 006. Harnam Singh died leaving behind two sons, namely, Prem Chand (Respondent 1 herein) and Ramesh Dutt (husband of the appellant). Ramesh Dutt died and is now represented by Mrs Kaushalya Devi, the appellant herein.
2. Respondent 1 filed a suit bearing No. 165 of 1992 in the Court of Civil Judge, Delhi.
3. The appellant, alleging that she had become the tenant in respect of the shops in question after the death of her father-in-law Harnam Singh, and was being dispossessed forcibly by her brother-in-law, Respondent 1, filed a suit bearing No. 58 of 1993 in the Court of the Senior Sub-Judge, Delhi.
4. Respondent 1 was served. He made a statement in the Court on 17 -3-1993 that he would not dispossess the appellant forcibly and without due process of law. The statement made by Prem Chand reads as under:
"I will not dispossess the plaintiff from the suit property and as per prayer clause Shops Nos. 3371-72, Chowk Singhara, Qutab Road, Delhi, forcibly and without due process of law."
5.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.