SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1513

P.VENKATARAMA REDDI, P.P.NAOLEKAR
CONSUMER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH SOCIETY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

1. On 27-7-2004 this Court passed the following order in IA No. 12:

"The State Government will also report to the Court after consulting the experts as regards the outer limit beyond the boundaries of the notified sanctuary within which the stoppage of mining operations is desirable."

2. Pursuant to this order, the State Government referred the issue to the expert body namely "Gujarat Ecological Education and Research (GEER) Foundation". The expert body after intensive study has submitted a report and the recommendation of the expert body is as follows:

"The inferences drawn from the present study indicate that mining operations, if carried out within 2.5 km from the boundaries of Narayan Sarovar Wildlife Sanctuary, should be considered as detrimental to the wildlife and wildlife habitat of the sanctuary. It is opined, therefore, that mining operations should not be allowed within 2.5 km beyond the boundaries of Narayan Sarovar Wildlife Sanctuary."

3. Earlier, the expert body referred to the adverse mining impact as per the visual observations made by it in three sites - Site A, Site and Site according to which the range varies from 2.00 km to 2.35 km. The expert body reporte



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top