ORDER

1. Heard the parties.

2. Leave granted.

3. The sole respondent was convicted by the trial court under Section 16(1-A) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafterreferred to as "the Act") and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs 4000, in default, to undergo further imprisonment for a period of three months. The conviction and sentence were upheld by the Sessions Court, on appeal being preferred by the respondent. Thereafter, the respondent filed a revision application before the High Court which maintained the conviction but reduced the sentence of imprisonment from one year to 21 days and enhanced the fine from Rs 4000 to Rs 10,000. Hence, this appeal by special leave.

4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant State submitted that under Section 16(1-A) of the Act minimum sentence of one year imprisonment has been prescribed and no discretion has been given to the court to reduce the same. This being the position, the High Court has committed an error in reducing the imprisonment from less than the minimum period prescribed under the statute.

5. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal i