SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 889

ARIJIT PASAYAT, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
BANGALORE CITY CORPORATION, BANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
P. A. KULKARNI – Respondent


ORDER

1. A tragic incident, due to collapse of a multi-storeyed building under construction took place on 12-9-1983 in the afternoon and resulted in the a death of 118 persons and injuries to about 50 persons. A Commission was set up to find out the real cause leading to collapse of the building. The Commission of Inquiry was headed by a High Court Judge which submitted its report in 1986. A public interest litigation was filed sometime in the year 1988 purporting to espouse the cause of those who had died and those who had been injured. By the impugned judgment, a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court directed grant of compensation by the Bangalore City Corporation and the State Government.

2. The details relating to the quantum are set out in para 11 of the impugned judgment. The appellant Corporation in this appeal primarily has taken the stand that for a case allegedly relating to tortious liability, a writ petition much less a public interest litigation was not the appropriate remedy. It is pointed out that the building was under construction and a private builder was undertaking the construction work. Therefore the direction for payment of compensation by the Corporation

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top