SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 891

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
RAHUL ALIAS RAOSAHEB – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


ORDER

1. The appellant was tried by the Court of Session, Pune for offences punishable under Sections 302, 363, 376(2)(f), 377 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and he was found guilty on all the counts. For the offences of murder punishable under Section 302 IPC, the appellant was sentenced to death and for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) as also for the offence under Section 377 IPC, the appellant was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. When the appeal came up for admission, this Court, by order dated 26-3-2004 granted leave and issued notice limited to the question of sentence.

2. We have heard counsel for the appellant and also the counsel for the State of Maharashtra. The prosecution case, in short, is that the appellant enticed a girl aged 4-112 years and took her to a deserted place and committed rape and later caused her death by inflicting injuries on her throat. The dead body was wrapped in a gunny bag and left in a pit near a stream. On the next day, the gunny bag was found and the gruesome murder came to light.

3. In the Sessions Court, the prosecution relied on the extra-judicial confession, medical evidence and also the fact that the appellant wa



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top