SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1091

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, K.T.THOMAS
RAJU RAM – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


ORDER

1. The appellant is one of the three accused persons convicted for offences under Sections 302, 387 read with Section 34 IPC. On 22-1-1992 at 6.30 p.m. the three persons were alleged to have gone to the shop of the deceased. They asked the shop-owner to come out. On the deceased going out of the shop, two of the assailants (one of them is the appellant) held two revolvers to the head of the victim and the third one (A-l Naresh Lal) had a dagger with him. Keeping the victim in that form they asked him to pay Rs 5000 plus the entire collection in the shop for that day. As the victim could not pay the said amount he expressed his helplessness. Keeping the victim in this form they asked his son PW 4 Anil Kumar to meet the demand. PW 4 also expressed helplessness to oblige the assailants. Then A-I Naresh Lal plunged the dagger into the abdomen of the victim. Thereafter, all the three ran away from the scene. The deceased succumbed to the injury thereby sustained.

2. As the trial court and the High Court believed the aforesaid version put forth by three witnesses (one of them was an employee of the same shop, another one was the neighbouring shop-owner and the third PW 4 Anil Kumar




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top