SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1137

S.N.VARIAVA, H.K.SEMA
State Of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
SURAl – Respondent


ORDER

1. This appeal is against 5-12-2000.

2. Briefly stated, the facts are as folIows:

The lands were acquired by the Government for instalIation of a brick kiln for making the Bhakra Canal. The purpose for which the land was acquired was completed. The Government had framed Standing Order 28. The relevant portion of which reads as under:

"When agricultural or pastoral land has been permanently acquired for public purposes by any department of the Government and is no longer required for such purposes, the disposal of it shalI be guided by the general consideration mentioned in paragraphs 493-95 of the Land Administration Manual which are reproduced below:

Paragraph 493 Disposal of land no longer required, where land in the permanent occupation of any departments of the Punjab Government is no longer required, it should be handed over to the Deputy Commissioner of the district,. who becomes responsible for the disposal of it under the orders of the Commissioner.

It may not, however, be permanently alienated without the previous sanction of the Government. There is no legal bar to its being put up to auction. But as a malter of grace, the Government is usualIy willing to restore agr




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top