SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 373

G.P.MATHUR, S.RAJENDRA BABU, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
GAON SABHA – Appellant
Versus
NATHI – Respondent


Judgment

G.P. MATHUR, J.- Civil Appeal No. 3105 of 1997 has been preferred by the Gaon Sabha and another against the judgment and decree dated 7-111991 of the Delhi High Court in RFA No. 209 of 1986. Civil Appeal No. 2183 of 1993 has been preferred by the Union of India and another against the judgment and decree dated 30-5-1991 of the Delhi High Court in RFA No. 167 of 1986. The controversy involved in both the appeals is identical

and, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common order. Civil Appeal No. 2183 of 1993 was initially allowed by this Court on 7-2-19971 but the order was recalled on 25-7-2003 on the ground that some of the respondents a had died and their heirs had not been brought on record when the matter was heard and decided at the earlier stage.

2. We will mention the facts of CA No. 3105 of 1997 which has been preferred by the Gaon Sabha and the Union of India against Nathi and 38 others. Proceedings for acquisition of a large tract of land were initiated by issuing notifications under Sections 4(1) and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act. b The Collector made an award but a dispute arose between the Gaon Sabha and the private respondents regarding the right to re








































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top