ORDER

1.Leave granted.

2.Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. This is the tenants appeal against eviction order passed by the courts below, on the ground of bona fide need of the landlord. The decree was passed by the trial court and confirmed by the appellate court. The appellants second appeal was also dismissed by the High Court. The ground of bona fide need is for his son for doing general merchant business at the disputed shop at Alwar. Submission for the appellant is that he is doing business at Delhi, hence this ground has no merit. This is the changed circumstance which is referred in the counter-affidavit. We have considered this additional point which has been stated in the counter-affidavit, coupled with the fact also disclosed in it that now• his grandsons are grown up who could look after the business at Delhi. The reason why the landlord wants his son settled at Alwar is that he has grown old and the son doing business can do both. looking after him and the business. This suit for eviction was filed in 1975. On account of delay in disposal of this case, alternatively he shifted to another place to earn his livelihood, but if his own shop is available. the reason