SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1291

N.S.HEGDE, B.P.SINGH
State Of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
A. RAJESWAR PATRA – Respondent


ORDER

1. On receipt of a reliable information that the respondent herein is

involved in selling of opium capsules, PW 4, the investigating officer in this case on 3-10-1972 at about 2.50 p.m. searched the shop and house belonging to the respondent and from the shop as also from an adjacent room seized six bags of poppy capsules of opium weighing 88 kg. On being charged of the offence which is punishable under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 the trial court convicted the respondent for the said offence and sentenced him to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment as also to pay a fine of rupees one lakh. In appeal the High Court came to the conclusion that the fact that the premises which were raided were also partly a residential building, Section 43 of the said Act is notapplicable and it is Section 42 which is applicable which requires the investigating officer on receipt of any information to reduce the same into writing recording his satisfaction as to the correctness and genuineness of the information received by him, and the same not having been done in this case came to the conclusion that the search and seizure was opposed to the mandato



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top