SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 86

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
S. K. KAPUR – Appellant
Versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL – Respondent


ORDER

1. The appellant, who was unsuccessful before the Labour Court, before the learned Single Judge of the High Court as well as before the Division Bench of the High Court, is before us in this appeal. He was a member of the municipal staff in New Delhi Municipal Corporation ("NDMC" for short). He took voluntary retirement from service with effect from 31-3-1981. He felt that he was entitled to ex gratia payment as well as grant of pay scales in the light of the judgment of this Court in the case of R.D. Gupta v. Lt. Governor, Delhi Admn.1 The Labour Court, on consideration of the facts and the contentions urged, concluded that the appellant could not get the benefit of the aforementioned judgment of this Court on the ground that as far as the grant of enhanced pay scales was concerned, it is clear that it is effective from 1-6-1982 and not prior to that. In that view, the Labour Court expressed the opinion that the appellant could not claim enhanced pension as the new pay scales were to be made effective from 1-6-1982, whereas the appellant had retired on 31-3-1981. Hence, the application filed by the appellant under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was dism






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top