B.N.AGARWAL, H.K.SEMA
SATPAL – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
ORDER
1.Heard the parties.
2.Application for impleadment is allowed.
3. The sole appellant was convicted by the trial court under Section 302 of the Penal Code (for short "IPC") and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs 10,000, in default, to undergo further imprisonment for a period of six months. On appeal being preferred, the High Court confirmed the conviction. Hence this appeal by special leave.
4. We have been taken through the first information report as well as evidence from which it appears that according to the prosecution case as well as evidence, no case under Section 302 IPC is made out, but at the highest, a case under Section 304-A IPC is disclosed. From the facts proved, it cannot be said that the accused had either intended to cause death of the victim or had knowledge that he was likely to cause death by such act. The evidence to prove a case of culpable homicide or murder is completely lacking. Merely because the victim was dashed by the vehicle which was being driven by the appellant, from that alone, neither a case of murder nor that of culpable homicide can be inferred. We are of the view that the facts alleged and proved show that a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.