SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 722

H.K.SEMA, A.K.MATHUR
Kamal Kumar Dutta – Appellant
Versus
Ruby General Hospitals LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.K. Mathur, J. — Leave granted.

2. These appeals are directed against the order dated 31.3.2005 passed by learned Company Judge, Calcutta High Court in APO No.746 of 1999 and APO No.759 of 1999 whereby learned Single Judge has disposed of the appeal and the cross-appeal arising out of the order dated 29.10.1999 passed by the Company Law Board (hereinafter to be referred to as CLB ).

3. Brief facts which are necessary for disposal of these appeals are that an application under Sections 397 & 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act ) was filed by Dr. Kamal Kumar Dutta and Dr. Binod Prasad Sinha alleging various acts and oppression and mis-management in the affairs of the company before the CLB. Ruby General Hospital Limited, a company was incorporated in the year 1991 by two non-resident Indian Doctors i.e. Dr. Kamal Kumar Dutta and Dr. Binod Prasad Sinha along with Indian enterprenuor, Shri Sajal Kumar Dutta, who is the younger brother of Dr. Kamal Kumar Dutta. The Company took up the project to establish a Hospital-cum-Advance Diagnostic facility at Calcutta. The cost of the project was about Rs.11 crore out of which the share capita


















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top