S.B.SINHA, DALVEER BHANDARI
Sandeep Subhash Parate – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J. — Leave granted.
2. The appellant claims himself to be a member of Halba community. Halba is a Scheduled Tribe. He obtained admission in the courses of Bachelor of Engineering (Instrumentation Engineering) in Pune University, (Respondent No.4), claiming himself to be belonging to Halba a Scheduled Tribe community. According to the appellant, the question as to whether Koshti-Halbas are members of Scheduled Tribe or not had been authoritatively decided for the first time in State of Maharashtra vs. Milind & Ors. [(2001) 1 SCC 4] and in that view of the matter, he had represented himself to be a member of Scheduled Tribe. Drawing our attention to the fact that even in Milind (supra), this Court directed that those, who have completed their courses from the universities, should be allowed to obtain degrees and get the benefit thereof as general candidates, the appellant was also entitled to a similar relief.
3. Indisputably, the Caste Scrutiny Committee constituted in terms of the decision of this Court in Kumari Madhuri Patil & Anr. vs. Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development & Ors. [(1994) 6 SCC 241] invalidated the caste certificate granted in favour o
State of Maharashtra v. Milind & Ors.
R. Vishwanatha Pillai etc. v. State of Kerala & Ors. etc.
Teri Oat Estates (P) Ltd. v. U.T., Chandigarh & Ors.
Kumari Madhuri Patil & Anr. v. Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development & Ors.
Bank of India & Anr. v. Avinash Mandivikar & Ors.
A. Sudhakar v. Post Master General, Hyderabad & Anr.
Ram Saran v. I.G. of Police, C.R.P.F. & Ors.
Employees State Insurance Corporation v. Distilleries & Chemical Mazdoor Union & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.