SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 81

B.N.KIRPAL, D.P.MOHAPATRA, M.B.SHAH
PATIALA INDS. INVESTMENT CO. (P) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


( 1 ) ). Substitution applications are allowed.

( 2 ) AFTER hearing the counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that the judgment of the High Court calls for no interference except to the extent that, as fairly conceded by the Solicitor-General, that the enhanced rate of interest @ 24% will be chargeable only w. e. f. 22-7-1993.

( 3 ) ). Revised calculation of the amounts due and payable by the petitioners will be on this basis, will be served on the petitioners within one week from today. Within four weeks from the service of the revised demands 25 per cent of the amount due from each of the petitioners will be paid to the respondents. The balance amount will be paid within four months of the service of notice of demand. It is clarified that the interest will continue to run at the enhanced rate on the decreasing balance till the date of payment.

( 4 ) ). If the payment is made as directed by this order, the Solicitor-General states that the respondent will not exercise their right of re-entry/forfeiture under clause 17 or any other appropriate clause on the ground of delay in payment of the amounts due to the respondents.

( 5 ) ). The petitioners shall, within two weeks fr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top