SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 559

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, P.VENKATARAMA REDDI
RAM LAL – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) HEARD both sides.

( 3 ) THE appellant herein was convicted for the offence punishable under section 326 read with Section 34 IPC. The appellant had caused injuries to two persons and the conviction was on two counts. The High Court was pleased to order that the conviction for imprisonment for 3 years on two counts shall run consecutively and not concurrently. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant filed this appeal from jail.

( 4 ) THE offence committed by the appellant is of serious nature and the prayer now made by the appellant is that the sentence shall run concurrently i. e. the total period shall be 3 years. We are not inclined to accept this contention. Therefore we reduce the sentence of imprisonment from 3 years to 2 years for the offence under Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC on two counts and order that it shall run consecutively i. e. the total period shall be 4 years.

( 5 ) THE appeal is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top