RUMA PAL, S.P.BHARUCHA, Y.K.SABHARWAL
G. KRISHNAMOORTHY – Appellant
Versus
S. N. D. P. YOGAM – Respondent
( 1 ) LEAVE granted.
( 2 ) THE order under challenge was passed by a Division Bench of the High court of Kerala. It noted that, by an earlier order of 17-2-2000, two commissioners had been appointed for the purposes of conducting the election of the office-bearers of the first respondent and that they were to finalise the voters list after inviting objections. The Commissioners had filed reports and had found irregularities and inconsistencies for which they had proposed solutions. The Division Bench noted that the term of the existing office-bearers had been completed. It felt that it was, therefore, necessary that the election should not be indefinitely postponed. It observed that there might"creep in some mistakes in the preparation of the electoral roll or voters list. But if one waits till all the mistakes are removed, it would not be possible to conduct the election. . . . If the argument of the respondents is accepted now, the election will have to be conducted without the representatives of many sakhas or in the alternative, the election of the office-bearers will have to be postponed till the sakhas elected new representatives". The High Court, therefore, came to the concl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.