SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1373

RUMA PAL, S.P.BHARUCHA, Y.K.SABHARWAL
G. KRISHNAMOORTHY – Appellant
Versus
S. N. D. P. YOGAM – Respondent


( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) THE order under challenge was passed by a Division Bench of the High court of Kerala. It noted that, by an earlier order of 17-2-2000, two commissioners had been appointed for the purposes of conducting the election of the office-bearers of the first respondent and that they were to finalise the voters list after inviting objections. The Commissioners had filed reports and had found irregularities and inconsistencies for which they had proposed solutions. The Division Bench noted that the term of the existing office-bearers had been completed. It felt that it was, therefore, necessary that the election should not be indefinitely postponed. It observed that there might"creep in some mistakes in the preparation of the electoral roll or voters list. But if one waits till all the mistakes are removed, it would not be possible to conduct the election. . . . If the argument of the respondents is accepted now, the election will have to be conducted without the representatives of many sakhas or in the alternative, the election of the office-bearers will have to be postponed till the sakhas elected new representatives". The High Court, therefore, came to the concl




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top