( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) THE order under appeal was passed by a Division Bench of the High court of Andhra Pradesh. The Central Administrative Tribunal had rejected the application of the writ petitioner (the respondent before us) for employment on compassionate grounds. The order of the Tribunal was the subject-matter of the writ petition. The order under appeal castigates the tribunal for having rejected the application "on flimsy grounds and on mere technicalities". It says that the Tribunal should have appreciated that the writ petitioner was aged two years at the time of the death of his father and that the application for compassionate appointment had been made upon the attainment of majority by the writ petitioner. It says that any refusal, even on the ground of non-availability of posts, was not an excuse and a post had to be created, if not available.

( 3 ) WE are of the opinion that the Tribunal took into consideration relevant facts to reject the application made to it, thus:"the case of Shri G. Murali (son of late Shri G. Sreeramulu, JS II) for his employment on compassionate grounds has been examined. Itis seen from the information furnished by the family that the fa