SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 915

G.B.PATTANAIK, M.B.SHAH, S.RAJENDRA BABU
COMMON CAUSE, A REGD. SOCIETY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


( 1 ) AFTER delivering of the judgment in a writ petition filed under Article 32, a review petition had been filed, and that review petition had been entertained and finally disposed of. The present application purports to be a review petition against the reviewed judgment. This application is wholly miscpnceived and there is no provision anywhere to file successive review petitions. The review petition is accordingly dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top