SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1892

B.N.AGARWAL, G.B.PATTANAIK
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
SARDARILAL – Respondent


( 1 ) IN these appeals by the State of Punjab, the common question that arises for consideration is whether the State Government has any power to override the decision of the appropriate authority of the University when such power is not conferred directly upon the State Government under the statute or any regulation framed thereunder.

( 2 ) THE State Government being the authority which funds the University for several purposes sought to rely upon the provisions of Sections 19, 23 and 25 of the Guru Nanak Dev University Amritsar Act, 1969 (for short "the act") and it was contended that the provisions of the aforesaid sections, if read together, it would appear that the State Government retains the power of control, particularly when it relates to the funds being spent by the University for various purposes including the grant of accelerated increment and allowance to its employees.

( 3 ) UNDER the University Statutes, Statute 41 deals with the grant of accelerated increment and allowance and power is conferred upon the syndicate or the Vice-Chancellor or the Registrar. The power of the State government under Section 25 of the Act to get the accounts of the University audited will

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top