SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 115

BRIJESH KUMAR, R.C.LAHOTI
LATIM LIFESTYLE and RESORTS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SAJ HOTELS (P) LTD. – Respondent


( 1 ) LEAVE granted in both the petitions.

( 2 ) THE property known as Saj Resorts, the land and building along with running business, at Mahableshwar, a hill station in the State of Maharashtra, is the subject-matter of the present litigation. The property was owned and operated as a running hotel by M/s Saj Hotels Pvt. Ltd. , a private limited company, hereinafter referred to as "the respondents" for short. Latim lifestyle and Resorts Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the appellants" for short) entered into a memorandum of understanding with the respondents whereby the respondents agreed for sale of the land and building known as saj Resorts at Mahableshwar as a going concern through the mode of transfer of shares. The appellants purchased 33. 33% shares of the respondents for a consideration of Rs 1,50,00,000. The possession of Saj Resorts was delivered to the appellants. Day-to-day management of affairs of Saj Resorts was taken over by the appellants and the respondents agreed not to interfere therein. On 27-11-1996 the parties agreed for the transfer of the remaining 2/3rd shareholdings of the respondents to the appellants, as per certain terms and conditions mutually agreed u



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top