SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 40

V.N.KHARE, A.R.LAKSHMANAN, S.B.SINHA
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
ZILA SINGHS – Respondent


( 1 ) DESPITE service, none appears on behalf of the respondents.

( 2 ) IA No. 2 for substitution is allowed.

( 3 ) DELAY condoned.

( 4 ) SPECIAL leave granted.

( 5 ) IN view of a three-Judge Bench decision of this Court in Union of india v. Ram Phool dated 28-11-2002, this appeal is allowed and the judgment under challenge is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top