SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 320

SAMTEL INDIA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPUR – Respondent


ORDER

1. These appeals are against the judgments of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (for short "CEGAT") dated 9-8-2000 and 3-8-2001. The question involved is with regard to interpretation of Rule 57F(17) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (for short "the Rules") which was introduced by an amendment, with effect from 1-3-1997.

2. Briefly stated the facts are as follows:

The appellants are manufacturers of black-and-white picture tubes which they export under a bond. For the manufacturing of black-and-white picture tubes, they use inputs on which duty is paid by them. Under the MODVAT Scheme, which was then in existence, they were entitled to credit for the duty paid against duty payable on the final product which is used for home consumption or on final product which is exported after payment of duty or where such adjustment is not possible to a refund of the duty.

3. It is an admitted position that the appellants had paid duty on the imports. It is admitted that the appellants had credit available to them. In Civil Appeal No. 6493 of 2000, they exported under bond in January and February 1997. In Civil Appeal No. 8692 of 2001 they exported under bond betwee























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top