SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1663

CEHAT – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has pointed out that in the affidavits tendered on behalf of the State Governments names of the members of the Advisory Committee are not disclosed and in any case are not published at the relevant places. In this view of the matter, the State Governments concerned are directed to publish the names of the members of the Advisory Committee in various districts so that if there is any complaint any citizen can approach them. Further, the statistics and information which are to be given in the affidavit should be given districtwise.

2. Mr Krishan Mahajan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Union of India states that despite the necessary warning by the Secretary, Health Department (Family Welfare), Health Secretaries of various States are not responding and are not interested in implementing the Act as well as the various directions issued by this Court. Today, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has produced the chart based on the affidavits filed by the various States which indicates that there is no desire on the part of the administrators concerned to implement seriously the law and orders passed by th















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top