Supreme Court Of India
Post Doctoral Research Associates of s. V. University, Dr. K. Krishna Reddy
Versus
Union of India
Decided on : April 26, 2002
Research Associateship - Post-Doctoral Research Associates - UGC, CSIR - 1983 Scheme, 1998 Discontinuation - Research Associateship Duration, Employment Nature, Scheme Discontinuation, Research Scholars' Security - Research Associates vs. Research Scientists Scheme - Research Associates vs. Pool Officers Scheme - Court's Observation and Dismissal
Fact of the Case:
The writ petitions were filed by Post-Doctoral Research Associates under the UGC or CSIR scheme, seeking direction for a secure and continuous research environment beyond the contract period. The UGC and CSIR had discontinued the Research Associateship scheme in 1998, leading to the dismissal of the petitions by the High Court of Delhi.
Finding of the Court:
The Court dismissed the petitions, emphasizing the tentative nature of Research Associateship and the absence of employment rights beyond the contract period. The Court observed that the scheme was intended as an interim arrangement for research pursuit and not as a permanent employment opportunity.
Issues: The issues revolved around the nature of Research Associateship, the discontinuation of the scheme, and the security of research scholars post-contract period.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasized the temporary nature of Research Associateship, distinguishing it from permanent employment schemes like Research Scientists and Pool Officers. The Court highlighted the social welfare aspect of the scheme and declined to direct the UGC or CSIR to frame a new scheme.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the writ petitions, without imposing any costs on the petitioners.
Judgment
RAJENDRA BABU, J.
( 1 ) THIS batch of writ petitions have been filed by Post-Doctoral Research Associates having Research Associateship under a scheme framed either by the University Grants Commission (for short ugc) or by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (for short csir ). Some of the petitioners had filed writ petitions before the High Court of Delhi in C. W. P. Nos. 4088/98 and these petitions were dismissed by stating that the petitioners cannot claim any right to continue to remain as Research Associates beyond the contract period and their right to remain in the said capacity come to an end on expiry of the contract period. Those petitioners are before this Court. The UGC has given a list of Research Associate and in practically all the cases the research work has not exceeded five years and on completion of the tenure their fellowship has been discontinued. Further it has been stated before us that earlier the UGC has discontinued the scheme for the year 1998 except in relation to those who are continued under the existing scheme.
( 2 ) UNDER the scheme, duration of the Research Associateship is for an initial period of three years and a further extension of one or two years would be given after evaluation by an expert committee. Such Research Associateship is not intended to be an employment but an interim arrangement made for getting a job in any University or College during which the Research Associate was given an opportunity to pursue research. If a Research Associate obtained employment during the currency of the Research Associateship, he was at liberty to resign from the Research Associateship and join a new post. They were not designated as Lecturers and the emoluments paid to them bear no relationship to the existing schemes in Universities.
( 3 ) CONSIDERING the tentative nature of this Associateship, on behalf of the writ petitioners it is urged before us in these writ petitions that the scheme of Research Associateship is counter productive causing great harm not only to the research scholars but also to the entire nation as once the tenure of Research Associateship expires there is no way to evaluate the validity or soundness of the research undertaken by them during the last a few years of such associateship; the UGC or CSIR cannot assess whether the expenditure incurred year after year in this regard is properly utilised or not; that the scheme contemplated by the UGC as well as CSIR clearly indicates that Research Associateship is treated as permanent except that the researchers are appointed on tenure basis; that the short tenures fixed under the scheme would defeat the very purpose of the research their being no continuity in the projects undertaken and when once the tenure is over, if there is no extension, the research done in the couple of years would be rendered futile; that if there is a sense of security with sustained follow-up under the control and supervision of the institutions, it would be useful not only to the scholars but also to the nation; that the UGC and CSIR Research Associateship are the first and perhaps the only avenues to doctorates intending to dedicate their lives for research. If sufficient security is provided to them as by the end of their Associateship they would be in a position to find any job else where, their service in the institution would be useful and fruitful. Therefore, they implore upon us for a direction to the respondents to evolve a scheme so that the research and development in the nation is optimally supported and benefited by the scholarship and intellect of the Research Associates and also provide a sense of security to them.
( 4 ) IN resisting these writ petitions, the UGC has set out in detail the nature of Research Associateship scheme which was formulated in 1983 and discontinued in 1998. The research contemplated would cover even work in humanities and social sciences including languages and science, engineering and technolog
Referred : CSIR and Ors v. Dr. Ajay Kumar Jain
V. L. Chandra and Ors. v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.