ASHOK BHAN, V.N.KHARE, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
Pavni Bai – Appellant
Versus
Loona – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High court allowing the second appeal preferred by the plaintiff-respondents, herein.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff-respondents brought a suit in the court of civil judge, Dhar for declaration that they being the sub-tenants of the land in dispute had acquired occupancy rights and thereafter have become bhoomiswami of the said land. The case of the plaintiff-respondents was that the land comprising in survey nos. 2, 21, 99, 242, 244 and 309 situate at village mangaol belonged to the defendant-appellants father Laiji along with laxmanrao. The said Laiji and laxmanrao sub-let the land to the father of the plaintiff-respondents. After the death of Laiji, his widow Bainabai and after her death her daughter became the co-tenant along with Laxmanrao in respect of the disputed land, and they were recorded as such in the revenue record. It was a further case of the plaintiff-respondents that after the death of their father, they continued to hold the land as sub-tenants of the defendant appellant and thus have acquired occupancy right on coming into force the Madhya Pradesh land Revenue Code (hereinafter referred to as the Code
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.