SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 766

ARIJIT PASAYAT, B.N.KIRPAL, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN
SIVASANKARAN – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment

B. N. KIRPAL, J.

( 1 ) ). Special leave granted.

( 2 ) IN the instant case, the cheque issued by the appellant had been dishonoured. This led to filing of a complaint under Section 138 of the negotiable Instruments Act and the appellant was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.

( 3 ) IT has now been brought to our notice that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties as a result whereof a sum of Rs 45,000 has been paid by the appellant in full and final settlement and the same has been received by Respondent 2, namely, K. K. Chandran. In the receipt filed in this court, it is stated that the said Chandran has no objection to the dismissal of the complaint or modification of the sentence imposed by the Court.

( 4 ) AFTER hearing the counsel for the parties, we modify the sentence and direct that instead of the appellant suffering imprisonment for six months a fine of Rs 1000 be imposed.

( 5 ) THIS appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top