M.B.SHAH, RUMA PAL
BACHHU SINGH ALIAS SURENDRA BABU – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) APPLICATION of injured witnesses is granted.
( 2 ) LEAVE granted.
( 3 ) THIS appeal is filed against the judgment and order passed by the High court of Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No. 2214 of 1980. By the impugned judgment and order the High Court partly allowed the appeals in respect of conviction and sentence under Sections 307 and 325 of the Indian Penal code (for short "ipc") and altered the same under Sections 324 and 323 read with Section 149 IPC. The High Court rejected the prayer for giving the benefit of probation on the ground that they have deliberately taken the law and order in their hands and had inflicted injuries on the complainant as well as shattered the entire management of the marriage of the nephew of the complainant which was to take place on the next date of the occurrence.
( 4 ) BY the impugned order the High Court directed that the accused chhitarmal and Meghshyam will undergo one years RI under Section 147 ipc and the appellants Rajendra Singh (since deceased), Bachhu Singh @ surendra Babu and Tej Pal will undergo two years RI under Section 148 IPC and also the accused-appellants will undergo two years RI under Section 324 ipc read with Section 149
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.