SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1090

S.S.M.QUADRI, Y.K.SABHARWAL
State Of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
SEATOR KILN CO. – Respondent


( 1 ) THE question that arises in this batch of civil appeals is: whether the subject-matter of writ petition filed by the respondent is covered by the judgment of the Full Bench of the Rajasthan High Court in Mohd. Bux v. State of Rajasthan.

( 2 ) CONVERSION of agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes in the state of Rajasthan is governed by the Rajasthan Colonisation Project Area brick Kiln (Leases) Conditions, 1966 (for short "the 1966 Rules") and granting of mining lease is governed by the Rajasthan Minor Mineral concession Rules, 1977 (framed under the Central Act) (for short "the 1977 rules" ). The respondents in these appeals were allotted plots of conversion of the agricultural lands into plots for the purpose of kiln. They paid certain amounts as conversion fee under the Rajasthan Land Revenue (Concession of agricultural into Non-Agricultural Land) Rules, 1961. The State of rajasthan amended the 1966 Rules and added Part C on 30-4-1988. Pursuant to the said amendment fresh demands were raised against the respondents who challenged the amended Rules as well as the demand raised against him. The learned Single Judge before whom the writ petition came up for hearing pr



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top