SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 870

K.T.THOMAS, Y.K.SABHARWAL
NOTIFIED AREA COMMITTEE – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION – Respondent


( 1 ) SERVICE completed.

( 2 ) LEAVE granted.

( 3 ) THE writ petition has been disposed of by the High Court without stating any reason whatsoever. Time and again this Court has pointed out that reasons are the flesh and blood of judicial adjudication and such reasons must be shown in the orders which are liable to be challenged in the superior court That applies to the High Court also. The impugned order reads thus:"we have heard the learned counsel on merits. We find no merit in this petition. Dismissed. "

( 4 ) IT is not a reasoned order. We, therefore, set aside the impugned order and remand the matter back to the High Court for disposal of the writ petition afresh in accordance with law.

( 5 ) THIS appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top