SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 764

S.N.VARIAVA, S.S.M.QUADRI
SIMI MEHROTRA – Appellant
Versus
ANIL MEHRPPOTRA – Respondent


( 1 ) HEARD the learned counsel for the parties.

( 2 ) THIS is a transfer petition by the wife. She seeks transfer of Case No. HMA 105 of 2001 titled Anil Mehrotra v. Simi Mehrotra, filed by the respondent husband for dissolution of marriage, which is pending before the district Court, Delhi. She states that she is living with her aged parents and there is no one else to accompany her so it is not possible for her to travel from Allahabad on each date of hearing to attend the court in Delhi. The fact that the petitioner is residing in Allahabad with her aged parents is not disputed by the respondent.

( 3 ) IN view of this fact, we consider it just and proper to order that Case no. HMA 105 of 2001 be transferred from the District Court, Delhi to the family Court, Allahabad.

( 4 ) THE transfer petition is accordingly ordered. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top