SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1835

B.N.AGARWAL, G.B.PATTANAIK
UT, CHANDIGARH – Appellant
Versus
AVTAR SINGH – Respondent


( 1 ) THE Union Territory of Chandigarh is in appeal against the order of the central Administrative Tribunal dated 7-12-1995 in OA No. 562 of 1994. The said application had been filed before the Tribunal by the respondent Avtar singh, who is still working as a Social Education and Panchayat Officer, chandigarh. The grievance of the respondent before the Tribunal was that he has been continuing as such Panchayat Officer and is not being considered for promotion to the post of Block Development and Panchayat Officer though in accordance with the Rules framed under the Panchayati Act he was entitled to be considered for promotion and if found suitable is entitled to be promoted to the post in question. Chandigarh Administration while filing their objections before the Tribunal contended therein that there is no sanctioned post of Block Development and Panchayat Officer in the Rural development Department of Chandigarh Administration, and as such the contention of the applicant before the Tribunal is futile. The further contention of Chandigarh Administration was that the notified area of chandigarh having been notified as a tehsil under the provisions of the 1961 act, a full-time exe




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top