B.N.AGARWAL, G.B.PATTANAIK
UT, CHANDIGARH – Appellant
Versus
AVTAR SINGH – Respondent
( 1 ) THE Union Territory of Chandigarh is in appeal against the order of the central Administrative Tribunal dated 7-12-1995 in OA No. 562 of 1994. The said application had been filed before the Tribunal by the respondent Avtar singh, who is still working as a Social Education and Panchayat Officer, chandigarh. The grievance of the respondent before the Tribunal was that he has been continuing as such Panchayat Officer and is not being considered for promotion to the post of Block Development and Panchayat Officer though in accordance with the Rules framed under the Panchayati Act he was entitled to be considered for promotion and if found suitable is entitled to be promoted to the post in question. Chandigarh Administration while filing their objections before the Tribunal contended therein that there is no sanctioned post of Block Development and Panchayat Officer in the Rural development Department of Chandigarh Administration, and as such the contention of the applicant before the Tribunal is futile. The further contention of Chandigarh Administration was that the notified area of chandigarh having been notified as a tehsil under the provisions of the 1961 act, a full-time exe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.