SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1946

Supreme Court Of India
CHAKRAWARTI PRASAD
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
Decided on : December 4, 2000

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438 - Anticipatory bail- Pilfering of electricity-Respondent claiming the charges more then Rs. one crores- Charges, as per respondent could cross even Rs. 40 lakhs if worked out for six months - Appellant already deposited Rs. 20 lakhs pursuant to order passed by High Court -Therefore anticipatory bail granted on the condition of remitting rupees 21 lakhs within a period of six months- If he remits one-third of that amount within one month he would be released on bail [Para 3]

( 1 ). Leave granted.

( 2 ) WE were not initially inclined to interfere with the order passed by the high Court because it was passed in the discretion of the High Court. But Dr rajeev Dhavan, learned Senior Counsel, under instructions, submitted that the appellant would deposit the amount of electricity charges of, the power alleged to have been pilfered. Mr B. B. Singh, learned counsel for the respondent worked it out to be more than a crore of rupees. We are not at present interested in fixing up as to the precise amount due from the appellant. If the charges of electricity alleged to have been pilfered can be worked out even for a period of six months, it may even cross the figure of 40 lakhs of rupees, according to the counsel. Dr Rajeev Dhavan pointed out that the appellant has already remitted Rs 20 lakhs pursuant to the order passed by the High Court.

( 3 ) CONSIDERING all aspects we think that anticipatory bail can be granted to the appellant on a condition that he should remit a sum of Rs 21 lakhs within a period of six months. If he remits one-third of that amount within one month from today he shall be released on bail. We permit him to surrender before the court concerned on or before the expiry of one month from today after remitting seven lakhs, being the first instalment and the court shall release him on bail on his executing a bond with two solvent sureties, provided he would give an undertaking to the court that within the next 3 months thereafter he would remit a further sum of Rs 7 lakhs and yet another sum of Rs 7 lakhs will be remitted within 3 months thereafter. We make it clear that if the appellant fails to remit any one of the instalments he shall forfeit the benefit granted to him by this order. The amount deposited will be without prejudice to the contentions of the rival parties and subject to the adjustment to be made at the final end. We stay his arrest for a period of one month from today to enable him to comply with the condition mentioned above.

( 4 ) THE appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top