Supreme Court Of India
M.B. SHAH, B.N. AGRAWALANDARIJIT PASAYAT, JJ
DEATH OF 25 CHAINED INMATES IN ASYLUM FIRE IN T.N., IN RE -Petitioner;
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Respondents.
Writ Petition (C) No. 334 of 2001
Decided on February 5, 2002
Advocates who appeared
Dr A.M. Singhvi (Amicus Curiae) and K. Ramamurthy, Senior Advocates [Pranab Kr.
Mullick (Amicus Curiae), Ms Revathy Raghavan, Krishan Mahajan, Ms Sunita Sharma, Ms Sushma Suri, Ranji Thomas, Javed Mahmood Rao, Sanjay R. Hegde, V.G. Pragasam, Sanjay K Shandilya, Ms V.D. Khanna, A. Mariaputham, Prakash Shrivastava, Anil Shrivastav, T.v. Ratnam, K. Subba Rao, Kh. Nobin Singh, Ms Rachna Srivastava, Ms A. Subhashini, C. Siddhartha, KL. Janjani, Y.P. Singh, Ajay Kr. Agrawal, Gopal Singh, Ms Asha G. Nair, Corporate Law Group, Tara Chandra Sharma, KR. Sasiprabhu, Ranjan Mukherjee, Ms Hemantika Wahi, Ms Anu Sawhney, Ms Jayashree Anand, Additional Advocate-General of Punjab, Rajeev Sharma, Ms Kamini Jaiswal, J.P. Dhanda, Ms Geetanjali Mohan, B.S. Banthia, S.V. Deshpande, Arup Banerjee and Ashok Mathur, Advocates, with them] for the appearing parties.
ORDER
1. On the basis of submission note of the Registrar (Judicial) to a news item published in all leading national dailies about a gruesome tragedy in. which more than 25 mentally challenged patients housed in a mental asylum at Ervadi in Ramanathapuram district were charred to death, the patients could not escape the blaze as they had been chained to poles or beds, this Court took suo motu action.
2. After considering the factual report, Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned Senior Counsel was appointed as amicus curiae to assist the Court and notice was also issued to the Union of India.
3. Thereafter, by order dated 15-10-2001 this Court called for the report from the State of Tamil Nadu on the subject and also sought information the topics which are mentioned, from the State Governments and Union Government on an affidavit of competent authority.
4. Thereafter, when the matter was placed before this Court on 21-1 2002, most of the States sought extension of time for compliance with the order passed by this Court. The matter was adjourned for 29-1-2002. On the day also, some of the State Governments again sought extension of time compliance with the directions issued by this Court. Further, learned amicus curiae submitted that the Mental Health Act, 1987 (for short "the 1987 Act is not at all implemented by the authorities concerned and there is failure the part of the Central/State Governments to implement the 1987 Act.
5. Mr Soli J. Sorabjee learned Attorney-General appearing on behalf the Union Government submitted that the 1987 Act is for the benefit mentally ill persons and is required to be implemented in right earnest. He submitted that the Centre would take appropriate action for implementation of the 1987 Act as early as possible.
6. In our view, it appears that there is slackness on the part of the authorities concerned to implement the laws enacted by Parliament. This is one such instance.
7. One of the objects of the 1987 Act is to provide a law relating to the treatment and care of the mentally ill persons. Notification for implementing the Act was published in the Gazette of India on 11-1-1993.
8. For the time being we would refer to the definition clause 2(l) which provides "mentally ill person" to mean a person who is in need of treatment by reason of any mental disorder other than mental retardation. Further, clause 2(q) inter alia provides "psychiatric hospital" and "psychiatric nursing home" to mean a nursing home established by any other person for the treatment and care of mentally ill persons and includes a convalescent home established or maintained by any other person for such mentally ill persons. The said section reads thus:
"2. (q) psychiatric hospital or psychiatric nursing home means a hospital or, as the case may be, a nursing home established or maintained by the Government or any other person for the treatment and care of mentally ill persons and includes a convalescent home established or maintained by the Government or any other person for such mentally ill persons; but does not include any general hospital or general nursing home established or maintained by the Government and which provides also for psychiatric services;"
Further, Section 3 provides that:
"3. (1) The Central Government shall establish an authority for mental health with such designation as it may deem fit.
(2) The Authority established under sub-section (1) shall be subject to the superintendence, direction and control of the Central Government.
(3) The Authority established under sub-section (1) shall-
(a) be in charge of regulation, development, direction and coordination with respect to Mental Health Services under the Central Government and all other matters which, under this Act, are the concern of the Central Government or any officer or authority subordinate to the
Central Government; I
(b) Supervise the psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric nursing homes and other mental health service agencies (including places in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.