Back
2000 Supreme(SC) 1743
Supreme Court Of India
B.N. KIRPAL, SHIVARAJY. PATILAND BISHESHWAR PRASAD SINGH, JJ
Civil Appeal No. 660 of 2000
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI -Appellant;
Versus
HILTON RUBBERS LTD. -Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 3841 of 2000
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI Appellant;
Versus
RAMMAICA (INDIA) LTD -Respondent.
Civil Appeals Nos. 5867-68 of 2000
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, TAMIL NADU-Appellant;
Versus
K. MANICKAM AND ANOTHER Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 3913 of 2001
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE Appellant;
Versus
CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ADVANCE COMPUTING -Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 4082 of 2001
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI Appellant;
Versus
HALDIRAM MANUFACTURING CO. LTD. Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 4455 of 2001
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI -Appellant;
Versus
AJAY FOOTWEAR (I) LTD. Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 6072 of 2001
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI Appellant;
Versus
PRABHAT ZARDA FACTORY Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 8455 of 2001
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH Appellant;
Versus
STANDARD TARPAUL INDUSTRIES Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 92 of 2002
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI Appellant;
Versus I
SONIA ENGINEERING WORKS PVT. LTD Respondent
Civil Appeals Nos. 660, 3841, 5867-68 of 2000 with Nos. 3913, 4082,4455,6072, 8455 of 2001 and 92 of 2002
Decided on February 27, 2002
The court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeals.
Headnote:
Dismissal - Civil Appeals - Summary
Fact of the Case:
The court dismissed the appeals for the reasons stated in a previous order and saw no reason to interfere with the decision of the Tribunal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found no reason to interfere with the decision of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeals.
Issues: The issues involved the dismissal of the appeals and the decision of the Tribunal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court decided not to interfere with the decision of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeals.
Final Decision: The final decision was to dismiss the appeals.
ORDER
CAs Nos. 660. 3841. 5867-68 of 2000. 4082. 4455. 6072, 8455 of 2001 and 92 of 2002
1. For the reasons stated in our order passed today in Civil Appeal No .3783 of 2000 entitled CCE v. Maruti Udyog Ltd. these appeals are dismissed.
Civil Appeal No. 3913 of2001
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we see no reason to interfere with the decision of the Tribunal. Hence, the civil appeal is dismissed.
