SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1819

Supreme Court Of India
B.N. KIRPAL, N. SANTOSH HEGDEAND DORAISWAMY RAJU, JJ

ADITYA CEMENT Appellant;

Versus
COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER, RAJASTHAN Respondent
IA No.1 in Civil Appeal No. 4472 of 2000
Decided on November 15, 2000

Interpretation of specific provisions of the deferment scheme and entitlement to claim deferment of tax under the scheme.

Headnote:

Sales Tax - Deferment Scheme for Industries - Interpretation of Provisions

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, a new and prestigious cement industry, claimed deferment of tax to the extent of 90 per cent under the Rajasthan Sales Tax New Deferment Scheme for Industries, 1989. The High Court judgment was in favor of the respondent.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the appellant, despite being a new and prestigious industry, was not entitled to claim deferment of tax to the extent of 90 per cent as the cement industry was included in the list of ineligible industries under the scheme. The specific benefit granted to a large-scale cement unit was deferment of tax to the extent of 50 per cent and no more.

Issues: Interpretation of the Rajasthan Sales Tax New Deferment Scheme for Industries, 1989 and entitlement of the appellant to claim deferment of tax.

Ratio Decidendi: The specific provisions of the deferment scheme, particularly the second proviso to clause 2(j) and clause 4, were interpreted to determine the entitlement of the appellant to claim deferment of tax.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.

ORDER

1. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that the judgment of the High Court is correct and calls for no interference. It is quite apparent from a reading of the "Rajasthan Sales Tax New Deferment Scheme for Industries, 1989" that even though the appellant may have been a new, very prestigious industry it is still not entitled to claim deferment of tax to the extent of 90 per cent, inasmuch as the cement industry is included in Annexure B* which contains a list of those industries which are ineligible to get the benefit of deferment of tax. However, the second proviso to clause 2(j) provides that a large-scale cement plant established, except in tribal sub-

* Ed.: Annexure B, Item 10 reads: (subs. by Am. Noti. dt. 11-1-1990): All cement plants (including white cement plants) except:

(a) Those in the small-scale sector;

(b) Mini cement plants of the capacity limited to 200 tonnes per day of 66,000 tonnes per annum; and

(c) New industrial units in the tribal sub-plan area. plan area, shall be entitled to deferment of tax as provided in clause 4 of this notification. Clause 4 of the notification specifically provides that in the case a of large-scale cement units having an investment of Rs 100 crores or more and located in a non-tribal sub-plan area shall be entitled to claim deferment of tax to the extent of 50 per cent of their tax liability under the Act with all other restrictions applicable to an industrial unit as provided in Annexure C.

2. The case of the appellant falls clearly within this. There is a specific benefit granted to a large-scale cement unit, whether it be a new, very prestigious unit or otherwise, and that it may have its deferment only to the extent of 50 per cent and no more.

3. For the aforesaid reasons, this appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top